The successive blows that the Darwinism has been subjected to in recent
decades have almost shifted it to a rack of oblivion. Despite all the desperate
attempts exerted by the fans of this old classical theory, and despite their
hopeless clinging on its worn-out rags and tatters, and despite their ongoing
endeavor to beautify its pale face even through forging fossils, or covering up
undesirable findings, or by extrapolation as we shall see in this article.
However the scientific deadly blows that it underwent in recent decades have
almost buried it. It only remained alive in the minds of those who are so
intimately possessed by the Darwinism, It is the same for such fans: the
scientific evidence and the mental illusion.
So what is the general path of Darwinism drawn by the book of : On the Origin
of Species of Charles Darwin, And what are some contradictions in this theory
forced up to be exposed on the surface
by these scientific findings?
In his book: On the origin of species Darwin assumed that the origin of all
living species and the descent of all beings is one. He referred to it in
different terms: primordial form, one prototype, …etc
( chapter 14 page 428 and Chapter 6 page157) and through ages, all this wide
diversity of life emerged from this
obscure and mysterious primitive being. The fans of this theory often refer to
this as a single-celled organm such as amoeba. All birds, fish reptiles,mammals, and
other animals descended from this same one-celled organism, man is no acception, for the apparent superficial analogy, he was quick to link him
indirectly to apes, Such as chimpanzee! I say: indirectly because there is what he called:” intermediate” or
“transitional form” that fills the gap between ape and man! This vanishing
intermediate is what he called” the missing link “ These missing links don't exclusively concern man and his organic relationship with his direct
predecessor, but with every other species. The missing links are indeed the
most famous absentee, and the clearest truant in this theory. Whenever Darwin’s
theory is derailed, came to a deadlocked he hangs his failure on the missing
link peg! In other word, he justifies his failure by the absence of missing
links. Darwin himself felt concerned about this dilemma that stains his theory,
and he admitted it throughout his book. Indeed, he was so concerned about this
mysterious disappearance of these missing links, or intermediates, that he
saved a special chapter in his book( Chapter 6) to deal with them, entitled:
Difficulties on theory. He said:" why, if
species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we
not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in
confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?
This is not the only difficulty, but there is a chapter of difficulties that he
himself admitted to have caused him to stagger.
Darwin said:
"…. Some of
them(difficulties) are so grave that to this day I can never reflect on them
without being staggered.(page 157 chapter 5)
Traslation the picture:The scientific discoveries force evolutionists to the unknown
Some of his justifications to those
difficulties are very pale indeed, and they don’t seem to be convincing at all.
Reading Darwin’s book On the Origin of Species one finds out that his reference
points are built upon a postulate idea
that evolution is progressing
in an ascending line. From the lowest to the highest, from the less complicated
to the most complicated. Darwin was not the first to be tempted by such trend
in classification; it has indeed tempted many other ancestors. The most famous
in the older world was Aristotle in his book: The history of Animals in which
he classified organisms according to their similar characteristics, those with
red blood and those without..etc. However, such trend has brought too many inconvenient
drawbacks to this theory.
This theory
disdained save being imprisoned through decades in a solitary confinement
called: a theory or a hypothesis. Its adherent fans; including some zealous
anthropologists were not able to free it and take it out to the vast , free
atmosphere of factual reality.
Many serious scientific researchers were able to penetrate the very thick
ceiling barrier, almost totally controlled globally by the pro-Darwinism fans.
One of these powerful researches made in recent years was that
of Dr Michael Denton. A very
famous British-Australian author, and physician- biochemist, and a senior
Fellow of the Discovery
Institute's Center
for Science and Culture who dedicated more than 10 years
of his life in laboratory studying the very molecular structures of cytochrome in some of the Darwin’s chain of organisms to
discover the level of sophistication in the respiratory cycle that involved
enzymes of very old creatures believed by Darwin to be the
ancestors, and forefathers of other numerous kinds of descendant creatures. He
found them as sophisticated as the latest alleged offspring. In some cases, he
found them to be even more sophisticated in the case of forefathers. His
research focus was on the very molecular structure of enzymes and the
eucaryotic cytochrome sequences. His research resulted in a very interesting
book entitled: Evolution: A Theory in Crisis
published 1985.13 years later 1998 he published his equally important book:
Nature’s Destiny in which he proved with unshakable scientific proof the
falsification of the randomness
accounts for the biology of organisms. Life according to Denton did not exist until initial
conditions of the universe were fine tuned. And proved instead the
design, and super intelligence that overwhelms life, and universe as whole.
There’re hundreds of other scientific
researches that started to gorge out forward. The latest that I read was a
research by a group of Canadian researchers
entitled: New evolutionary research disproves living
missing link theories. It proved that:
Genetic research proves worms has evolved to be less
sophisticated than their ancestors
Despite the fact that the evolutionists didn't find those mysterious missing
links, and despite all these tremendous flow of scientific findings,
evolutionists still insist on their arrogance and try to turn
blind eye to
them.
Here is an example of how people get deceived
To be continued
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق